Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Brenda, the fact that you are being abused has affected my life in the following ways.

The sister that I knew and loved growing up no longer exists. The person I now before me now is just a punching bag. And I call you “person” not woman because a woman is strong, beautiful, vibrant creature. A woman embraces life. A woman makes choices to make her life better. Sadly, the fact that you are with Jaff proves to my that you have made a choice to make your life worse. I . . . I want the girl I grew up with back. I want . . . I . . . I want my sister back. I . . . Brenda, I love you. Please make the right decision.

Read Full Post »

As a result, the Communists tried to portray Orwell either as a traitor who played into the hands of the right-wing or as the work of a disillusioned and desperately ill man. Brian Rubin quotes Llew Gardner of the Daily Worker: “When he wrote1984, the anti-socialist work that shocked the nation on television, George Orwell was sick in mind and body, a fast dying man” (18 December 1954.) Although Orwell had been seriously ill with tuberculosis since 1947 and his health had not been good before that – he acknowledged in a letter to George Woodcock that the book was gloomy because he had been feeling so ill when he wrote it – it is a gross distortion to suggest that he was mentally ill. Orwell had been making plans for a further novel and arranging for treatment in a Swiss clinic when he had his fatal lung haemorrhage. Certainly, he was expecting to live a little longer. Apart from the obvious political tactic of trying to denigrate Orwell, to see Nineteen Eighty Four in psychological terms is to ignore the fact that the book draws together ideas that Orwell had been expressing for more than ten years.

 

The Political Ideas of George Orwell

Read Full Post »

I want to read her book.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/video/2012/dec/07/edna-obrien-autobiography-country-girl-interview-video

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/02/2006_39_fri.shtml

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/ram/2006_39_fri_02.ram

 

Read Full Post »

“For my whole life, my favorite activity was reading. It’s not the most social pastime.” 
— Audrey Hepburn
Is it not? I thought I could socialise with the characters that authors create for their readers. But I like this saying, anyway.

 

“Elegance is the only beauty that never fades.”
— Audrey Hepburn
So true! Elegance is the only thing in my whole life I forever pursue.

 

“As you grow older, you will discover that you have two hands, one for helping yourself, the other for helping others.” 
— Audrey Hepburn
I always feel happier and more content when I realise I can give rather than be given. That’s why I thought about working in charities.

 

“Nothing is impossible, the word itself says ‘I’m possible’!”
— Audrey Hepburn
There’s another my faviourite quote from the film, Chicken Run: “Where there’s will, there’s a way.” Isn’t this so true?

 

“There is one difference between a long life & a great dinner; in the dinner, the sweet things come last.” 
— Audrey Hepburn

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

“To philosophise is to think for oneself; but no one can truly do so without drawing on the thoughts of others, especially those of the great philosophers of the past.”

 

“Philosophy is not a science, nor is it wisdom, nor even knowledge: it is a meditation on what knowledge is available. This is why you cannot learn philosophy, according to Kant: you can only learn to philosophize. How? By philosophizing yourself: by thinking about your own thoughts, the thoughts of others, the world, society, about what experience has taught you, and what it hasn’t taught you … Hopefully, in doing so, you will come across a work by some professional philosopher along the way.”

 

“… because we need to think about the thins we know, the things we experience, the things we desire, questions which knowledge alone cannot answer or dismiss.”

 

“What can I know? What should I do? What may I hope? What is man? ‘… the first three question relate to the last,’ he remarks. But all of them, I would add, lead to a fifth which, philosophically and humanly, is probably the most important: How should I live? As soon as one tries to answer this question intelligently, one begins to philosophize.”

 

“‘Philosophy,’ wrote Kant, ‘is man’s striving for wisdom, which is ever incomplete.'”

 

“Philosophy is about thinking better in order to live better.”

 

“Ethics begins when we are free: it is freedom itself, when that freedom is considered and controlled.”

 

to be continue . . .

Read Full Post »

Descendants

The most beautiful things oftentimes are the most dangerous.

Read Full Post »

Where there’s a will, there’s a way.

I got this saying from an animation, Chicken Run. I like it very much, and it is always my belief!

When my friends begin doubting if they are able to achieve what they dream, what they wish, I always tell them with a cheerful smile, “YOU WILL DO IT”. Instead of telling them what they “can”, I rather make them more confident, I say to them, “You will”. “Can” is a choice, but “Will” is a persistent statement that will make people see their bright future.

As my UK study is about to finish, but I still want to stay in England for a bit while because I love England. So I say to myself, “If I happen to go back to Taiwan, I WILL come back and make myself a living in England very soon, in a year.” I have a will, and “I WILL.”

People ask me, “Don’t you miss your family?”

Yes, I do, and I miss them and love them so much. But it is the freedom I’m pursuing (I grew up in a very protective family), and it is the English speaking environment I’m pursuing. No matter where I go, that doesn’t decrease the love I give my family. 🙂

Read Full Post »

True friends . . .

Read Full Post »

Talking about this book, I had it for a bit while, but had never got a chance to read it until now. In fact, here I can’t say this is a book review because I haven’t finished it yet. And actually, I don’t have any interest in finishing it anymore. Why?

As I have said I have had for a bit time. I remember when I walked int WH Smith looking for some books that could make me laugh and get relaxed from my exhausted essays. And there it was, I saw the book cover saying “Extremely funny – Sunday Times”, and there was a dog printed in the middle of the cover, and it was top-selling at that time. So I thought it might be a nice book to read.

NO! It was not funny at all, well, in my opinion. In fact, I found it quite disturbing to read it. I don’t know if it is because I don’t know British “family” culture that much or what? The language, the way the family members battling each other . . . I just can’t understand it. I don’t know why the daughter can swear to describe her mother and doesn’t want to admit she’s her daughter or anything like that. And the mother who is a child-psychologist has problems with her children. I can see that Dawn French intends to highlight this point to make the readers laugh and feel funny, but I just don’t understand it AT ALL. I tried hard to like it and kept reading it, but I failed. Less than 30 pages, I closed the book, and put it back in my shelf thinking to sell it.

Oh, by the way, I have heard that Dawn French is a comedian (but I don’t know her and haven’t seen any her shows, actually), but I really don’t buy her sense of humour in this book.

Recommendation: ONE star (unfortunately!)

Read Full Post »

I felt sick what exactly happened to Christine by near the end of this book.

Two days in total I finished this book. It was a random selection from Amazon after I finished The Reader. I did the pre-reading on Amazon, but didn’t think about buying and keeping reading the book. Eventually, I did when I was waiting for the train at London Victoria Station. I went in WH Smith and decided buying it.

It was fascinating. I couldn’t really stop reading it even when I lied on my bed and was preparing to sleep. I shouted in my head that few more sentences, then I’d close the book and wait until tomorrow to keep reading the rest; no, it always ended up reading few more pages or even till the end of one chapter.

As I read from the beginning, I had sensed who was the suspect. It was not out of my guess, but not like what I expected in the end. And I felt sick  knowing why the suspect did this to Christine. Why sick? In fact, I wasn’t expecting this book would have any connection with my thoughts or my life, unlike The Reader, understanding why Michael didn’t save Hannah in the trial. I read this book with a complete freshness of a new story, but it ended up bringing the thoughts of my relationship with him again. Right, I didn’t feel sick about how this book made the suspect become, but I felt sick with myself.

The suspect is a psychopath. I remember I have read it somewhere, says a psychopath who killed his wife didn’t understand why people didn’t understand how much his love for his wife. The death of his wife to him was not only the loss of his wife but also his best friend. However, he did not regret what he had done. When I read this, I felt chilled. I cannot deny I have thoughts of “destroying him” because of how he hurt me and used me. I have anger more than sadness about what he has done to me. I blame him using me and using my love for him to satisfy whatever he demanded. And then when he realised I had nothing more to give him, he pushed me away, as far as he could. He took every advantage from me. I had nothing, NOTHING from him. I called him a “psychopath”, but at the same time I became like a psychopath. The pain he gave me seemed shape me into a psychopath.

Turning back to discuss the book, the author left a few questions in the end of this book. Oddly, I can answer few of them by telling how I understand the pain, the anger and the sadness of the suspect.

Do you think that Christine’s affair is out of character for her? Why do you think it happened? Why do you think she risks her marriage? Does she treat her husband well? And the suspect? Was she being fair to him?

In my opinion, Christine was not fair to the suspect. The suspect did have a crush on her at first and wanted to know her more, so he tried approaching her. And at the same time Christine felt depressed from being unable to produce a second novel and feel annoyed with her husband, she noticed the suspect and gave him an invitation to approaching her. If she didn’t start the invitation, the suspect might not be involved in Christine’s marriage with her husband. She cheated on her husband, and the suspect found himself deeply in love with her. One day she realised she could not do it anymore, and she had to go back to her husband. She did explain this to the suspect and wanted him to be out of her life. She decided he had no more chance to see her again. He wasn’t given a good explanation. She controlled everything from the beginning, the invitation, to the end, blocking him out contacting her. He felt used. The time Christine being with him was just to consult her loneliness when she had problems with her family. She used his love for her to fill her lonely heart. Now he left nothing from her, not even a good explanation. How could he not be mad? He felt hurt, used and unbalanced, but did she know how badly she hurt him? They didn’t have to go to this far if she didn’t start all of this first. Even if it had started, she needed to pay back to balance how much she had taken from the suspect, and then “slowly” let go of it. I don’t know why I had no pity for Christine after all.

I’m aware that I might have become a psychopath after he used me and left me. This book came to remind me that I have to stop from thinking destroying him. I don’t want to be a dangerous psychopath, but I’m hurt, so badly. He stepped on my self-esteem. How could I stand not humiliating him as much as he did to me?

I don’t know. I really don’t. My mind splits into two fighting each other. I do wish I could be like Christine somehow to wipe out memories, but only the memories with him, because I’m so tired of thinking of how he treated me when I so much want to get him out of my head.

 

However, the recommendation by rating this book I gave 4 stars. As quite a few reviewers mentioned on Amazon, I did notice there were plot holes and repetitions in this book, and the ending was predictable from the beginning. I always wondered how Christine could use only last than 24 hours, or I should say “the only time her husband was out to work” doing so many things, reading her journal (especially after she’s been writing a lot during the treatment), meeting her doctor, writing her journal, etc. However, this book is still recommendable since this book is S J Watson’s debut. I believe his future novels will get more better in managing the plots.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »